Big 5 Tobacco File Lawsuit to Fight New Warning Labels
On September 22, 2012, all cigarette packaging and advertising must display one of the FDAs 9 pre-approved graphic and text health warnings.
These labels are designed to discourage youths from smoking and to provide greater appeal for quitting to current smokers.
However, on September 21, 2011 a hearing was held in U.S. Federal District Court regarding the constitutionality of these warnings.
Big Tobacco Files Lawsuit
Five major tobacco manufacturers filed a lawsuit against the FDA on August 16, 2011 in hopes of achieving an injunction against the mandatory implementation of graphic and text warnings on cigarette packages and advertisements.
The tobacco manufacturing companies involved with this lawsuit are:
- R.J. Reynolds
- Lorillard Tobacco Co.
- Commonwealth Brands Inc.
- Ligget Group LLC
- Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. Inc.
The tobacco companies’ lawsuit against the FDA was filed on the grounds that the mandatory text and graphic warnings infringed on the constitutional free speech of the tobacco manufacturers. They have asked that the FDAs mandatory implementation be dismissed, and that a new set of warnings that do not threaten their constitutional right be developed. Following this, a new fifteen month waiting period will be set before the new warnings become effective.
The FDA Taken to Court . . . Again
In August 2009, a similar lawsuit was filed on behalf of Discount Tobacco City & Lottery Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Conwood Co. LLC, Commonwealth Brands Inc., Lorillard Tobacco Co., and National Tobacco Co. The purpose was to have it declared the FDAs proposed graphic and text warnings were unconstitutional.
The judge dismissed the suit, and an appeal was filed. A decision is still pending from the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on this case.
Tobacco Manufacturers Argue Warnings Are Unconstitutional
What’s at issue with the tobacco manufacturers is whether or not the FDAs nine warnings portray actual health risks as a result from smoking, or whether or not they stem more from an advocacy perspective.
Tobacco use accounts for more than one in five deaths. Smoking remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in America.
Judge Richard Leon’s decision on the injunction is expected by the end of October.
Reference: http://www.csdecisions.com/2011/09/22/tobacco-companies-fight-warning-labels/
Related Posts:
- Cigarillos: Big Tobacco’s Candy Coated Chicanery
Sales of cigarillos in candy flavours like raspberry and mint chocolate are up 300% in Canada. Anti-smoking groups fear their... - Big Tobacco Companies Covered Up Radiation Dangers From Smoking
Tobacco companies have covered up for 40 years the fact that cigarette smoke contains a dangerous radioactive substance that exposes... - Will New FDA Regulations Backfire and Lend Big Tobacco a Hand?
Government tobacco regulation has been a topic of discussion for years. Today, the house approved a bill titled, “Family Smoking... - Trial Tech Smokes Out Big Tobacco
Senior counsel Sharon Eubanks, a 22-year veteran attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice, quit her job on the cusp... - Big Tobacco Before Congress: Ex-Tobacco Scientist Tells Story at Pinon Hills, Nevada
Minden – Students of Pinon Hills Elementary School expressed both wonder and disgust when Victor DeNoble walked around showing them...
Tags: advocacy, big tobacco, constitutional rights, fda, fda tobacco warning, free speech, health warnings of tobacco, quit smoking, tobacco laws
What do you think? Please enter your comments below.